Court approves restrictions on Minneapolis police use of force during peaceful protests
The measure is part of a class-action suit filed by the ACLU on behalf of 12 protesters
MINNEAPOLIS — Officials with the ACLU-MN say an injunction approved by a federal court judge Wednesday, Nov. 30, will restrict the types of force Minneapolis police officers can use against peaceful protesters.
The measure is part of a class-action suit filed by the ACLU on behalf of 12 protesters who say Minneapolis police used unnecessary and excessive force to suppress protesters’ First Amendment rights during protests that followed the police killing of George Floyd in 2020.
Plaintiff attorney Josh Rissman called the injunction historic.
“The City of Minneapolis has agreed to an injunction enforceable in federal court,” Rissman said in a statement. “Anytime the Minneapolis Police Department unlawfully uses rubber bullets, mace or tear gas against peaceful protesters, we can immediately seek to enforce the injunction.”
The agreement prohibits the city from arresting, threatening to arrest, or using physical force like chemical agents, flash-bang grenades and foam-tipped bullets against people engaging in lawful demonstrations.
The injunction also limits the use of chemical agents by police to disperse peaceful protests.
The agreement between the City of Minneapolis and the protesters, which was reached in October, also requires the city to pay the plaintiffs a total of $600,000.
Longtime activist and plaintiff Nekima Levy Armstrong said the ruling should act as a wake-up call across the state for lawmakers to pass laws that will protect First Amendment rights, regardless of the responding law enforcement agency.
"To use their authority under the law to take action and put forward standards that are in alignment with national and international best practices to protect protesters and others who are out on the front lines," she said.